Take a piece of parchment or fine quality writing paper and inscribe the name of the target. Write it in a circle twice, so the ends meet. As you do this, concentrate on the person's face and your desire that they call you. Then, while still concentr... Read more of To get someone to call you at White Magic.caInformational Site Network Informational
Privacy
Home Top Rated Puzzles Most Viewed Puzzles All Puzzle Questions Random Puzzle Question Search

Math Puzzle . ca - math and logic puzzles

Looking for brainteaser puzzles, mensa mind challenges, math puzzles and logic problems?

Welcome to MathPuzzle.ca the home of logic and math puzzles. Choose from hundreds of logic math puzzles and brainteasers. Start by browsing the categories, they are divided into different logic type puzzles. If you are unsure where to go, click on the random logic puzzle from the top menu.






DISSECTING A MITRE.

(Various Dissection Puzzles)
The figure that is perplexing the carpenter in the illustration
represents a mitre. It will be seen that its proportions are those of a
square with one quarter removed. The puzzle is to cut it into five
pieces that will fit together and form a perfect square. I show an
attempt, published in America, to perform the feat in four pieces, based
on what is known as the "step principle," but it is a fallacy.
We are told first to cut oft the pieces 1 and 2 and pack them into the
triangular space marked off by the dotted line, and so form a rectangle.
So far, so good. Now, we are directed to apply the old step principle,
as shown, and, by moving down the piece 4 one step, form the required
square. But, unfortunately, it does _not_ produce a square: only an
oblong. Call the three long sides of the mitre 84 in. each. Then, before
cutting the steps, our rectangle in three pieces will be 84 x 63. The
steps must be 101/2 in. in height and 12 in. in breadth. Therefore, by
moving down a step we reduce by 12 in. the side 84 in. and increase by
101/2 in. the side 63 in. Hence our final rectangle must be 72 in. x 731/2
in., which certainly is not a square! The fact is, the step principle
can only be applied to rectangles with sides of particular relative
lengths. For example, if the shorter side in this case were 61+5/7
(instead of 63), then the step method would apply. For the steps would
then be 10+2/7 in. in height and 12 in. in breadth. Note that 61+5/7 x
84 = the square of 72. At present no solution has been found in four
pieces, and I do not believe one possible.


Read Answer